[I will edit this into a slideshow, but my laptop cannot run the program necessary to upload so it will be done at a later time]
Drawing Assignments - Picasa.com
"Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the soul of genius.”
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Heaping piles of...art??!
After perusing through countless articles on numerous blogs, a series of pictures featuring unimpressive piles of segregated rubble in a gallery space caught my attention. This is the work of Lara Almarcegui, a Spanish-born artist whose artistic fancy lies in "wastelands" - those nostalgic patches of land marking the desecration of a past structure that is slowly being reclaimed by nature, on which societies are deliberating what should be done with them so that, for the time being, they remain wastelands. The press release for her show "Bauschutt Hauptraum Secession" in Vienna (2010) is found on the Contemporary Art blog.
Lara's message (according to the press release which appears to quote her) is, in summary, to emphasize the importance and value of these wastelands that are in a transitional period: not only do they reflect nature's capability of reclaming past territory, they are something that reflects both the past and the possibility of the future and that only exists temporarily; constantly changing. Lara attempts to document the locations and images of these wastelands all over the world - this is her art.
First of all, I would like to make a statement against the exhibit featuring these piles of rubble she has amassed and labelled "art": when first I saw this picture, what drew my attention was "What on earth has happened? What lunatic has managed to fool the curators into believing that several hundred rocks piled together, without facing any other skillful alteration by the person, are deserving of this gallery space?" It wasn't until AFTER I had painstakingly read the review that I even began to understand Lara's statement through this gargantuan display (although its significance still escapes me): she piled recycled materials that were used in previously destroyed buildings and that would be used for construction in the future - again, a transitional period that at the moment presents itself as a wasteland. Because I've yet to hear of anybody - artist or otherwise - investigating this transitional period, I find it to be a rather interesting subject. However, do not agree with the approach: Lara has chosen to display strictly symbolic items that, without accompanying explanation, offer little to no insight pertaining to their specific meaning to the viewer. I, for instance, would not have arrived at the conclusion of "transitional wasteland" had I not read the accompanying review, and because these works are so strictly centered on this underlying theme, I find it to be crippling for the piece's stature as "artwork". If I were to walk past these piles of rubble in a gallery space, I would immediately assume that somebody made a critical error; that this gallery space was actually in the midst of construction, and I would thus pass them by without a second thought. Outside of the gallery space, nothing would differentiate these piles of rubble from any other, so why is it that we call them art? Is it because Lara arranged them in order to convey a message?
And furthermore, I do not appreciate the manner in which these art reviews are presented: in Lara's case anyways, the review is highly biased towards her case which manipulates the reader into finding an appreciation for her work without looking and feeling for themselves. In order to instill their own opinions into the reader, the author of this article utilizes such manipulators as, "a poetic work awaits the visitors", "Lara Almarcequi renders visible what we otherwise fail to regard, see or notice", etc. The author even treads on my personal pet-peeve by writing "...an organism of social structures that pervades them——and fills them with meaning". This is the most VAGUE statement any analytical writer could possibly make when conducting a review; it is absolute bogus and leads the reader to think "ah, meaning, that's so deep!" without really thinking about what "meaning" the writer could possibly be talking about!
I am not one to judge an artist based solely on the analytical capabilities of one review author: I appreciate Lara's statement and find it to be both unique and interesting (although I maintain my stance of disagreement with the piles of rubble in the gallery space...). For the most part, I wanted to play devil's advocate towards this review since it was so pointed towards Lara's work. This is yet another reminder of how manipulative ANY media text can be, and how we as a society must view everything through eyes unclouded by bias, in search of truth and not opinion.
Monday, September 6, 2010
My first memory...
It started out a fine and dandy day - just as they all do - when all of a sudden the walls of my dark cozy room started pressing in on me, and after hours of discomfort I was launched into a cold and unforgiving world...!
...no not really, I can't remember being born. My first memory is, in all actuality, of a much less profound point in my life:
I was sitting in a shiny new red wagon in the front yard of our house. It was my birthday - somewhere around age 4 I'd assume - and my tiny hands were clenched around a long-awaited Thumbelina baby doll. Much to my disdain, my older cousin Nicole approached me, audaciously asked to see my brand new doll, and proceeded to snatch it away from me. Thinking I might never get it back, I burst into tears.
And there it is: my first memory is not of any significant point in my life. It's just a reminder of how painfully timid and possessive a child I was.
And here I am somewhere around that age. (Oh hey, this photo reminds me of another story. Can I write it...? To hell with it, it's in parentheses: that's my dad with the bagpipes; he's kind of my hero. Anyways, we're at the Scottish games, and they have lots of Scottish games at the Scottish games. Nonsensical, dangerous games, one of which is a telephone-pole toss. I don't remember this, but I'm told that on this particular year I - being adorable and little and...well, not smart - decided it'd be awesome to try to run across the field on which these telephone poles were being tossed. Thanks to my dad's quick reflexes, I'm alive to tell the story! Hahaha, ooohh Scottish games...)
...no not really, I can't remember being born. My first memory is, in all actuality, of a much less profound point in my life:
I was sitting in a shiny new red wagon in the front yard of our house. It was my birthday - somewhere around age 4 I'd assume - and my tiny hands were clenched around a long-awaited Thumbelina baby doll. Much to my disdain, my older cousin Nicole approached me, audaciously asked to see my brand new doll, and proceeded to snatch it away from me. Thinking I might never get it back, I burst into tears.
And there it is: my first memory is not of any significant point in my life. It's just a reminder of how painfully timid and possessive a child I was.
And here I am somewhere around that age. (Oh hey, this photo reminds me of another story. Can I write it...? To hell with it, it's in parentheses: that's my dad with the bagpipes; he's kind of my hero. Anyways, we're at the Scottish games, and they have lots of Scottish games at the Scottish games. Nonsensical, dangerous games, one of which is a telephone-pole toss. I don't remember this, but I'm told that on this particular year I - being adorable and little and...well, not smart - decided it'd be awesome to try to run across the field on which these telephone poles were being tossed. Thanks to my dad's quick reflexes, I'm alive to tell the story! Hahaha, ooohh Scottish games...)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
